Please forgive me if this is a breach of Webring etiquette. I, too, am a Ringmaster, and I have an important message about the Stalker that this site is about. She has her own website, where she claims to be a victim of stalking, and names ME as HER stalker. This is ludicrous.
What you will find contained in this website are 1300+ pages of hard evidence against this person. This evidence includes, but is not limited to, Criminal Dockets, emails authored by her, testimony from many other people victimized by her, (including a very prominent Ringmaster), and so much more. This site is purely evidenciary, though it also provides many helpful links for victims of various types of abuse.
By contrast, her site is a single page rant, with absolutely no corroboration of her statements. Unfortunately, her website has found it's way into many webrings. It is my feeling that an anti-abuse/harassment ring that contains her site is polluted by said site.
I ask that you compare the two sites, and accept only one. The site that you accept is entirely up to you, therefore I rely on your judgment to discern the difference between 1300 pages of FACT, provided by law enforcement and other sources, as opposed to her single page of unbsubstantiated ranting.
Her site can be found at the following URL: http://www.geocities.com/truth2003usa/statement.html
Lastly, even if you read nothing else on this site, I respectfully ask that you look at these three pages: